The commonly cited Australian Excess Mortality graphs and figures are alarming but they can be deceiving...and they can hide things that people don't want you to see if you don't look closely enough..
Good work. I think much of ths sort of obfuscation is "de rigeur" as governments instruct statisticians to conceal evidence of criminality and wilful negligence.
It’s been difficult to tell people that our governments aren’t satisfied with simply stealing as much as they can from us but actually are killing us. People just resist the message. This kind of work brings clarity to the conversation. Thank you for posting this!
Absolutely terrifying. My husband just had to argue with a cardiologist about not wanting a blood transfusion and my mom has turbo dementia. What have they done? Thankyou for this.
There are two reasons why dementia deaths and unknown deaths are up.
Dementia deaths are up not because there is more dementia deaths but when the elderly are given a high lethality drug or locked in their room "because COVID" and die they conveniently mark them as dementia deaths.
The unknown deaths are increased because the doctors working in hospitals or the GPs who are administering the jabs don't want to put down a cause of death, because they know.
There is so much wrong in our medical establishment that this data exposes.
* Dementia - loneliness and poor care. Already dementia, so just mark their deterioration as a dementia death. In addition, what are the chances that the vaccine breaks the BBB and accelerates dementia?
* Unknown - Well, there are 2 types, here. "Other" Doctor certified deaths and non-Doctor certified deaths.
"Other" is basically a Doctor certified death (with, I assume, a cause attached) but they don't give details on these individual causes in the ABS reports. They report on the Big 6 (Cancer, Dementia, Diabetes, Respiratory, Ischemic and Cerebrovascular) and COVID. I don't think they want to give details on the million other causes, so they don't. They don't even have an "Other" category, but I can get the numbers by adding the reporting categories together and subtracting from the total Doctor Certified. So, I think there is a couple of Causes that aren't "Big 6 + COVID" that have actually spiked but aren't detailed. I'd be interested to know what they are.
non-Doctor certified (calculated by subtracting all Doctor Certified from total mortality) I'm thinking are Coroner certified deaths. Table 3.1 tab, which shows total mortality, actually has an explanatory note at the bottom that says "This table includes doctor certified and coroner certified deaths" whereas Table 3.3 has the explanatory note "This table only includes doctor certified deaths" - and that's where the individual causes come from.
Which, if I'm right about the above...begs the question - how many non-Doctor (Coroner) certified deaths are there that actually fit into those other categories? Are there more (for example) Ischemic deaths than are being reported? How do the Coroner causes break down? Are we missing something?
non-Doctor (Coroner?) certified deaths are consistent as a % since 2015 (87-88%) so I don't think they're trying to hide anything via not having Doctors certify so they don't have to report, but it's still an interesting question.
Not sure if you also follow the work of the Actuaries Institute - COVID-19 MORTALITY WORKING GROUP they also produce some pretty good articles if your interested.
They have a similar graph to yours (their Figure 16) regarding heart conditions.
I think some of them may actually read critisism/feedback here on substack as they seem to update and improve their reports to reflect some of the critique on substack.
I actually got the idea for using Trendlines from Karen Cutter, who is part of that group, on Twitter.
Not too sure how to view her, yet, but my gut feeling atm is that, while she seem very nice, she's trying to obfuscate the truth. I just don't know if she is sticking her head in the sand to avoid reality or if she is being instructed/paid to do it.
She has tried to explain away the decline in births in NSW (economic issues, immigration, climate change) even when her own data shows this not to be true (on immigration). And when I reply to her threads with data that shows the Q1, 2022 spike, for example, or the fallacy of the excuses being trotted out for a birth rate decline, she just goes silent.
In regards to this data, I their approach seemed to be to muddy the waters on the averaged Baselines (because the ABS releases are causing a stir) along the lines of "Averaged Baselines don't always reflect the truth!" without offering a legitimate alternative such as Trendlines (because they highlight the Q1, 2022 spike, for example.
So, jury is still out on Karen and the Group, but I'm leaning towards them being controlled the more times they avoid the truth.
“Not too sure how to view her, yet, but my gut feeling atm is that, while she seem very nice, she's trying to obfuscate the truth. I just don't know if she is sticking her head in the sand to avoid reality or if she is being instructed/paid to do it.”
Exactly. I think she is avoiding sticking her head on the chopping block. I don’t think they get paid to do this work so I commend the group for doing the work even though I disagree with some of their conclusions. These guys all probably have day jobs and being “too truthful” is probably career limiting. The numbers don’t lie, unless they’re fake (which I don’t think they are) but their meaning is always open to interpretation.
Good work. I think much of ths sort of obfuscation is "de rigeur" as governments instruct statisticians to conceal evidence of criminality and wilful negligence.
It’s been difficult to tell people that our governments aren’t satisfied with simply stealing as much as they can from us but actually are killing us. People just resist the message. This kind of work brings clarity to the conversation. Thank you for posting this!
Absolutely terrifying. My husband just had to argue with a cardiologist about not wanting a blood transfusion and my mom has turbo dementia. What have they done? Thankyou for this.
Good work MDU, It's quite a slam dunk.
There are two reasons why dementia deaths and unknown deaths are up.
Dementia deaths are up not because there is more dementia deaths but when the elderly are given a high lethality drug or locked in their room "because COVID" and die they conveniently mark them as dementia deaths.
The unknown deaths are increased because the doctors working in hospitals or the GPs who are administering the jabs don't want to put down a cause of death, because they know.
There is so much wrong in our medical establishment that this data exposes.
It's horrific.
My thoughts on those two were:
* Dementia - loneliness and poor care. Already dementia, so just mark their deterioration as a dementia death. In addition, what are the chances that the vaccine breaks the BBB and accelerates dementia?
* Unknown - Well, there are 2 types, here. "Other" Doctor certified deaths and non-Doctor certified deaths.
"Other" is basically a Doctor certified death (with, I assume, a cause attached) but they don't give details on these individual causes in the ABS reports. They report on the Big 6 (Cancer, Dementia, Diabetes, Respiratory, Ischemic and Cerebrovascular) and COVID. I don't think they want to give details on the million other causes, so they don't. They don't even have an "Other" category, but I can get the numbers by adding the reporting categories together and subtracting from the total Doctor Certified. So, I think there is a couple of Causes that aren't "Big 6 + COVID" that have actually spiked but aren't detailed. I'd be interested to know what they are.
non-Doctor certified (calculated by subtracting all Doctor Certified from total mortality) I'm thinking are Coroner certified deaths. Table 3.1 tab, which shows total mortality, actually has an explanatory note at the bottom that says "This table includes doctor certified and coroner certified deaths" whereas Table 3.3 has the explanatory note "This table only includes doctor certified deaths" - and that's where the individual causes come from.
Which, if I'm right about the above...begs the question - how many non-Doctor (Coroner) certified deaths are there that actually fit into those other categories? Are there more (for example) Ischemic deaths than are being reported? How do the Coroner causes break down? Are we missing something?
non-Doctor (Coroner?) certified deaths are consistent as a % since 2015 (87-88%) so I don't think they're trying to hide anything via not having Doctors certify so they don't have to report, but it's still an interesting question.
Splendid work, thank you!
The shinyapp over at the WMD website is very good for playing with the different baselines.
Nice work. 👍
Not sure if you also follow the work of the Actuaries Institute - COVID-19 MORTALITY WORKING GROUP they also produce some pretty good articles if your interested.
Latest Article:
https://www.actuaries.digital/2023/07/06/excess-mortality-running-at-6-for-the-first-three-months-of-2023/
All articles:
https://www.actuaries.digital/author/covid-19-mortality-working-group/
I don’t always agree with their conclusions but they do a pretty good job at crunching the numbers.
Their last detailed report (next detailed report will be next month:
https://www.actuaries.digital/2023/04/06/covid-19-mortality-working-group-confirmation-of-20000-excess-deaths-for-2022-in-australia/
They have a similar graph to yours (their Figure 16) regarding heart conditions.
I think some of them may actually read critisism/feedback here on substack as they seem to update and improve their reports to reflect some of the critique on substack.
I actually got the idea for using Trendlines from Karen Cutter, who is part of that group, on Twitter.
Not too sure how to view her, yet, but my gut feeling atm is that, while she seem very nice, she's trying to obfuscate the truth. I just don't know if she is sticking her head in the sand to avoid reality or if she is being instructed/paid to do it.
She has tried to explain away the decline in births in NSW (economic issues, immigration, climate change) even when her own data shows this not to be true (on immigration). And when I reply to her threads with data that shows the Q1, 2022 spike, for example, or the fallacy of the excuses being trotted out for a birth rate decline, she just goes silent.
In regards to this data, I their approach seemed to be to muddy the waters on the averaged Baselines (because the ABS releases are causing a stir) along the lines of "Averaged Baselines don't always reflect the truth!" without offering a legitimate alternative such as Trendlines (because they highlight the Q1, 2022 spike, for example.
So, jury is still out on Karen and the Group, but I'm leaning towards them being controlled the more times they avoid the truth.
“Not too sure how to view her, yet, but my gut feeling atm is that, while she seem very nice, she's trying to obfuscate the truth. I just don't know if she is sticking her head in the sand to avoid reality or if she is being instructed/paid to do it.”
Exactly. I think she is avoiding sticking her head on the chopping block. I don’t think they get paid to do this work so I commend the group for doing the work even though I disagree with some of their conclusions. These guys all probably have day jobs and being “too truthful” is probably career limiting. The numbers don’t lie, unless they’re fake (which I don’t think they are) but their meaning is always open to interpretation.
They use the same fraud with the numbers on the climate hoax. NOTHING "they" publish can be trusted AT ALL.
Excellent work!