Does the Vaccine cause AIDS?
Transferring old GAB posts #2
This is a transfer of an old Gab post that can be found here: https://gab.com/ManDownUnder/posts/107829541676133530 from February 20, 2022.
I am transferring my Pinned posts from Gab just in case I ever need to be Unpin them. I do not want them to be lost in my old Timeline.
DOES THE VACCINE CAUSE AIDS???
A lot of talk recently In early 2022, when the original Gab post was made) has been about the HIV inserts into the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the theory that is causes AIDS (or VAIDS, as it is being called). Does it?
Prashant's original paper from Feb, 2020, regarding HIV inserts into SARS-CoV-2 caused a stir, even after the Powers That Be forced its retraction.
My gut feeling was yes but I just couldn't pin it down...
Last week I realised that some of the data I had been already tracking, plus a graph I had put together to visualise some questions I had about the data, plus something about AIDS that I had long forgotten...all came together to make me finally think "Yes, I'm now pretty certain that the vaccine does cause AIDS".
We need to start with the question "What is AIDS?".
My knee-jerk reaction to that question is that it's the "junkie/homosexual disease" but that's not right. That is HIV, which causes AIDS. They're not the same thing.
That's because AIDS is ACQUIRED Immunodeficiency Syndrome.
Now, a lot of people actually see AIDS as a form of ACCELERATED AGEING - HIV accelerates the normal deterioration of your immune system so, if left untreated, when AIDS develops, a 40-year old may end up with, say, a 70-year old's immune system. And we know that's not good, because mortality really starts to skyrocket in your 60s because you no longer have the immune system to fight off the things that can do you damage (cancer, influenza, COVID-19 etc.).
The HIV or AIDS doesn't necessary kill you. It's EVERYTHING ELSE that might kill you.
Search "AIDS accelerated ageing"
And you might end up with this.
"As a result, non-AIDS conditions which are age-associated have become more prevalent and appear earlier, resulting in accelerated aging in HIV patients. These non-AIDS conditions in HIV patients are associated with CD4+ T cell counts: lower counts are associated with higher rates of liver, cardiovascular, renal, and neurocognitive disorders."
Other literature shows that ageing linked to a reduction in T-Cells (such as CD4) - https://www.jimmunol.org/content/187/5/2093.long
"There has been a long-standing interest in the regulation of human T cell senescence and how this may restrict the maintenance of immune memory. Previous work has focused either on the role of persistent viruses in shaping the T cell repertoire during aging and how this leads to immune dysfunction."
and
"In addition, CD4+ EMRA T cells that are specific for particular immunodominant epitopes of persistent viruses such as CMV accumulate in older humans."
So, keep in mind that AIDS = Accelerated Ageing is NOT a controversial position to hold.
PART 1) Official UKHSA COVID Infection Data
I have been tracking Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated SARS-Cov_2 infection comparisons from the official UKHSA reports since September, 2021. It's the best data set in the world because it is punctual (every Friday morning) and breaks the numbers down by vaccination status and age brackets, while giving a per capita number as well as the headline figure. Best data set in the world, bar none.
One thing that struck me was odd was how the different age groups for Double Vaccinated individuals all ended up with different relationships to their Unvaccinated age group counterparts:
80yo+ didn't see that much difference between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated in terms of infection rates;
18-29 had a surprisingly low difference between the two groups, as well;
But the 40-49 age group difference was massive - the biggest of the lot.
The following same graph but only leaving in those 3 age groups (18-29, 40-49 and 80+) so you can see them more clearly and think more clearly about their relationship to each other, without the clutter of the other age groups.
Now, the 80+ situation I figured out pretty quickly - most normal (Unvaccinated) 80 year olds didn't have much of an immune system left, anyways, so if the vaccine was wiping out immune systems then there's not much left to wipe out. As such, there wouldn't be much of a difference between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated individuals.
And the 40-49 pretty much made sense, as well - a massive difference because there was still a lot of immune system to wipe out. So, a 45-year old who had their immune system wiped out would show a big difference to a 45-year old who still had their immune system intact.
But the 18-29 year olds? They should have had a WIDER gap than even the 40-49 year olds because their immune systems would barely have started degrading at all. So, why was the 18-29 age group trending to have a surprisingly small difference between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated individuals.
NOTE: You can see the 18-29 rise already trailing off before Week 48/49, before all groups shoot up massively. That shoot up is because of Omicron, which scorched the vaccines and blew all of the comparisons out of the water. For my thoughts on declining vaccine effectiveness (and Omicron scorching the vaccines) read this: https://gab.com/ManDownUnder/posts/107795787277603810
But for now, we want to focus on everything up to the point Omicron blew the vaccines into oblivion.
So...to recap…the 80+ had a small difference, as expected because there wasn't much of an immune system to lose. And the 40-49 had a massive difference because there WAS an immune system to lose. But, completely unexpectedly, the 18-29s looked to be trending towards only a small difference.
If the vaccines were destroying immune systems then the 18-29s didn't fit...
Then it occurred to me - they're NOT destroying the immune system. They are AGEING it.
PART 2) Accelerated Ageing
When do people really start dying? On average, in their 60s.
OK, so - an 80-year old doesn't have much of an immune system left, so ageing their immune system, say, 20 years, isn't going to create much of a difference.
A 45-year old? Age their immune system to a 65-year old equivalent and they'll move into the high risk bracket and you'll see a BIG difference.
But a 25-year old? Age their immune system 20yrs and make them a 45-year old equivalent and...there's not much of a difference. That person is still 15-20 years away from the "Danger Zone" and , at "45", still in the bracket of low mortality. So, not much of a difference. Back when I realised this (around Nov 21) I made a graph to visualise how I thinking about it.
NOTE: None of the numbers are real. They are not based on scientific literature or data. They are purely made up so that I could visualise what I was thinking, to understand the UKHSA data and why 18-29s were trending with such a low difference between Vaxxed and Unvaxxed people.
Here's how the it works:
Blue Line - my imaginary decline of the immune system over someone's life;
Red Line - same line as the blue, just pulled left 20yrs to push the immune system of an older person into someone 20yrs younger;
Green Bars - the difference between each age group when comparing the 2 lines - the biggest is the 40-49s, while the 20s and 80s have lower differences.
This (kind of) mimics the UKHSA data. It's not perfect , because I just made that last graph up, but it's close enough to (in my opinion) validate the point - the vaccines AGE YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM, not destroy it.
PART 3) The Daily Expose article and how they missed the kill shot.
You might have seen this Daily Expose article - https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/09/uk-gov-data-suggests-fully-vaccinated-developing-ade/?fbclid=IwAR2XoNhTn3-SVb_C3PVKhikRBg8amyeyu4bFPIiGMK8-0kloX2IXlIRNdRA
It's a decent article and lays out a solid argument that the vaccines are smashing people's immune systems.
It uses the same data that I have been tracking since September - official UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Reports for infections, comparing Double Vaccinated to Unvaccinated.
But, I think the point it is trying to make is that the vaccine DESTROYS your immune system. And as I've laid out, I don't think that is EXACTLY right.
The article does not cover the oddity that was stumping me - why were the 18-29s tracking to only have a small difference? If the vaccine was absolutely destroying your immune system, then the 18-29s would have as big a difference to their Unvaccinated age group counterparts as the 40-49s did. But they didn't appear to be trending that way. Why was that?
And so while I think the DE article is good, I also think it misses that crucial point. If AIDS is really an accelerated ageing of the immune system, then the thing that REALLY points out that the vaccine gives you AIDS is actually tracking all age groups together in the one line graph over time, so that the 18-29s stand out and make you start asking questions.
Luckily, I did that, and luckily I got stumped by the 18-29s, so luckily I had to start thinking about it.
And so, when I came across an article talking about AIDS as Accelerated Ageing in Arkmedic's Telegram Chat group (https://t.me/arkmedic), it triggered my memory of people talking about AIDS that way and the final piece of the puzzle fell into place.
Anyways, I'm not a scientist and this is only my trying to get my thoughts down into words so I can understand them a bit more.
If you got this far, thanks. I'll put a quick summary in the comments.
The “save” on pension costs and long term (chronic) health care costs will trump any short term blip of acute medical care costs. Covid, both elements, hits people where they are weakest.
Is it the duty of a Doctor to heal, or destroy, the person or person’s who come to them for medical assistance and therein is the conundrum at the moment, it seems to me.
How does your patient learn their trust in you, when you in turn are the representative of the pharmaceutical company whose pills and potions you prescribe, to clear their illnesses and where do your loyalties lie – is it to earn an excellent living, saving lives, after all of the years of training and hardship to reach that point in time – or is it money over care and damn the consequences?
I posted this on Medscape UK earlier today and it is hit or miss whether my post will make it past the moderator – but I at least tried (again):
Although it is hard to get kids to have a salt water snort or sniffle, taking them down the beach and having them do that instead, is a really good idea because the salt kills all viruses and thus the viruses themselves cannot evolve into Covid or anything else in the nasal passages of the head - which an mRNA vaccine injection into the arm does not address.
It is impossible to catch Covid, a cold or the flu has to be caught first and this evolves into Covid in the nasal passages of the head, as you are well aware, transported down into the body in the one liter of snot or mucus we each produce daily, the engine oil of the body.
A simple solution in itself, I suggest one heaped teaspoon of salt in a mug of warm clean water, cup a hand, pour some of the mix in and sniff and snort the mugful up the nasal passages.
A burning sensation means a virus is present and is transforming itself into, potentially, Covid or a very bad head cold, so leave salt water in place until soreness goes away (2-3 minutes for an established infection, considerably less if not).
Do the above treatment morning, noon, night until soreness goes away for good - blowing nose out on toilet paper - no sore symptoms, no cold or potentially Covid, ever - me 30 years NEVER ill from external airborne viruses or bacteria.
Which begs the question - how can an injection into the arm cure an infection in the nasal passages of the head?
Which begs the question - what is in the synthetic mRNA vaccines which pass through the blood brain barrier into the very inner workings of the body - and how can that stop any infection in the head, where the head and the body have zero interaction, except to keep a body alive?
Use an Android phone with Bluetooth to detect your vaccinated body's 10 digit number - why? well a computer somewhere might determine your end of life experience sooner than you expected - "if the number is there" - and what to do about it:
Touch a 12 volt DC electric catte fence wire with both hands, the one second jolt will kill all blood borne diseases: Lyme Disease, Encyphalitus, possibly early onset Cancer and the installed nanotechnology which provides your body with its own identifying number - which begs the question - what causes Cardiomyopathies and people randomly dropping down dead, don't you think?